European Textbooks, by Anna Makowka-Kwapisiewicz. 2024. Impact-se
Auschwitz-Birkenau Jewish Monopoly. Zolnierze Wykleci Trashed
This lewak (leftist) author “evaluates” textbooks used in Polish schools. She describes herself as a “historian, journalist, and expert in social engagement and human rights protection.” Really? She deftly ignores Polish human rights, ignores or rationalizes all wrongdoing done by the Jews, and, just as predictably, blames everything on the Poles. Follow the money. If she is not a shill for the Holocaust Industry, then it is not for lack of trying.
The author is obsessed with stereotypes, mentioning this term 44 times! The stereotypes are always about the Jews, and predictably, never about Poles, as she does constantly without even batting an eyelash.
AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU JEWISH MONOPOLY: REINFORCING THE NARRATIVE
In this report, the Holocaust is mentioned 139 times. Makowka-Kwapisiewicz defends the Jewish “ownership” of Auschwitz-Birkenau with these silly statements, “In the text, they (Jews) are listed alongside Soviet prisoners of war, homosexuals, and so-called asocial prisoners, such as prostitutes and the homeless. This narrative omits the fact that Jews were the primary group targeted for extermination. By placing Jews in the same category as other groups, the text obscures the fact that the Holocaust aimed at the systematic annihilation of Jews in a manner distinct from the persecution of other groups.” (p. 45). She adds that, “The failure to describe Auschwitz-Birkenau as a central symbol of the Holocaust and as the largest site of mass murder of this group distorts the true role of the camp.” (p. 45)
Let’s poke a little fun at the foregoing oft-repeated narrative:
HOW TO DIVIDE THE DEAD? JAN PECZKIS SATIRE OF HOLOCAUST SUPREMACY IN ACTION
Mosquitoes say that humans drain swamps to kill mosquitoes collectively and preventively, and nothing like this is done to cows or pigs. Therefore the killing of mosquitoes is absolutely unique, and mosquitoes are entitled to privileged recognition as victims. Following Jewish logic, why not?
In addition, mosquitoes complain that they are killed simply because they are mosquitoes, while pigs and cows are killed for a rational reason (as a source of meat). So mosquito deaths are distinctive in a way that other animal deaths are not. Following Jewish logic, why not?
More pigs are killed in a slaughterhouse than any other animal. So pigs thereby get to marginalize all the other slaughtered animals.
The butcher reputedly dislikes pigs more than he dislikes cows, so therefore this makes the pigs special victims.
A larger overall share of pigs is reputedly slated to be butchered than the corresponding share of other animals. This therefore makes the slaughter of pigs more significant than the slaughter of all the other animals.
The pigs proclaim the slaughterhouse a symbol of their deaths. Therefore they get to define the slaughterhouse as a place exclusively of pig killings.
Let’s get serious again:
If a murderer was out to kill the entire Smith family, but was content to murder “only” part of the Jones family, is the Smith family thereby entitled to special recognition? Nope.
If 95% of the victims of an airplane crash are Christians, does this thereby entitle the Christians to monopolize the crash site? Laugh.
Does that “central symbol of the Holocaust”, that Jews have imagined for Auschwitz-Birkenau, get forcibly imposed upon everybody else? Evidently yes.
For more on the Auschwitz-Birkenau Jewish monopoly, see:
https://www.jewsandpolesdatabase.org/2025/07/02/forgotten-auschwitz-poles-memory-holed-now/
MAKOWKA-KWAPISEWICZ’S TIRADE AGAINST THE ZOLNIERZE WYKLECI (INDOMITABLE SOLDIERS)
The author repeats unsubstantiated allegations that the Zolnierze Wykleci killed Byelorussians and Jews. (p. 79). Makowka-Kwapisiewicz is blindly steeped in Judeocentrism, leftist ideation, and allergy to Polish heroism. That is what drives Makowka-Kwapisiewicz to treat this alleged incident as more important than the tens of thousands of Poles murdered by the Communists–which she conveniently omits.
“JEWISH POLES”? WANTING IT BOTH WAYS. HOLOCAUST SUPREMACY ANEW
Author Makowka-Kwapisiewicz complains that, “Jewish history in Poland is often treated as a separate topic, rather than integrated into the broader narrative of Polish national history.” (p. 2). How sad.
And then the author does an about-face, as she whines about Polish educational policies, “…often place(s) Jewish experiences alongside Polish suffering and heroism during the same period, which can diminish the distinctiveness of Jewish victimhood.” (p. 2). Oh, dear!
So are Poland’s Jews actually Poles or are they not? She cannot have it both ways!
